<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux &amp; Hinduism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kaveri.org/wp/2002/09/linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kaveri.org/wp/2002/09/linux/</link>
	<description>Critical thoughts on spirituality, science, and the unchallenged gray areas in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:06:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajesh T</title>
		<link>http://kaveri.org/wp/2002/09/linux/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajesh T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 05:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kaveri.org/wp/?p=23#comment-18</guid>
		<description>One more Comparision.  No offense meant.Similarities between (Girls and Windows) and (Boys and Linux)Girls and Windows- Both have a great UI.- Both consume large resources and do less work.- Both crash unexpectedly.- Both are not easily portable on different architectures  (environment).- Both can&#039;t work on low resource architectures (environment).- Both are costly to maintain.- Both give mostly unexpected outputs.- Both&#039;s working often contradicts with their documentation.- Both are easily prone to viruses (rumors and doubts) (and they   (viruses) do spread very fast in windows based networks).- In spite of all above disadvantages, both are liked.Boys and Linux- Both have an average UI.- Both are robust.- Both are highly secure.- Both can be easily modified to support new  concepts/features.- Both are efficient.- Both are easily portable to any architecture (environment) no matter how low are resources.- You can easily guess the output for your input (in Linux  just open its code, for boys they are mostly transparent by natureJ).- Both provide large support for development (work  environment).- Both are poorly documented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more Comparision.  No offense meant.Similarities between (Girls and Windows) and (Boys and Linux)Girls and Windows- Both have a great UI.- Both consume large resources and do less work.- Both crash unexpectedly.- Both are not easily portable on different architectures  (environment).- Both can&#8217;t work on low resource architectures (environment).- Both are costly to maintain.- Both give mostly unexpected outputs.- Both&#8217;s working often contradicts with their documentation.- Both are easily prone to viruses (rumors and doubts) (and they   (viruses) do spread very fast in windows based networks).- In spite of all above disadvantages, both are liked.Boys and Linux- Both have an average UI.- Both are robust.- Both are highly secure.- Both can be easily modified to support new  concepts/features.- Both are efficient.- Both are easily portable to any architecture (environment) no matter how low are resources.- You can easily guess the output for your input (in Linux  just open its code, for boys they are mostly transparent by natureJ).- Both provide large support for development (work  environment).- Both are poorly documented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunil</title>
		<link>http://kaveri.org/wp/2002/09/linux/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>sunil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2004 04:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kaveri.org/wp/?p=23#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Is it fair to say that Linux users are more enlightened than Microsoft users ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it fair to say that Linux users are more enlightened than Microsoft users ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

